A Morbid Fascination: The Long and Surprising History of the Dead Pool

Introduction: The Modern Game and Its Ancient Roots

In the sprawling, often strange, ecosystem of internet culture, the celebrity dead pool has become a peculiar and enduring fixture.³ Known also as a "death pool" or "ghoul pool," the game, in its modern form, is one of prediction and morbid sport.^{1, 4} Participants draft a list of public figures they believe will die within a specified timeframe, typically a calendar year, and points are awarded for each correct "hit".^{3, 4} It exists at a unique intersection of celebrity obsession, dark humor, and the pervasive gamification of modern life.⁴ The practice is defined by a central tension that fuels both its popularity and its controversy: is it a harmless form of entertainment, a tasteless exploitation of human tragedy, or something far more complex?⁵ Critics decry it as ghoulish and disrespectful, particularly when it targets the elderly or ill, while proponents defend it as a form of gallows humor, a detached game of media analysis with no real-world impact.^{5, 6} This debate, however, often presumes the dead pool is a recent invention, a product of an irreverent and desensitized digital age.⁷ Yet, this assumption overlooks a rich and surprisingly deep history.⁸ Far from being a modern phenomenon, the celebrity dead pool is merely the latest iteration of a practice of wagering on mortality that stretches back over 600 years.⁹ Its evolution is a story that runs parallel to our changing conceptions of fame, finance, media, and mortality itself.¹⁰ From the high-stakes political speculation of Renaissance Rome to the gentlemen's clubs of Georgian London and the newsrooms of 20th-century America, the impulse to predict the end of a public life has been a consistent, if unsettling, human fascination.¹¹ This is the history of that morbid fascination.¹²

Chapter 1: Betting on the Holy See: The Renaissance Origins of the Death Wager

The earliest documented forms of wagering on death were not born of idle entertainment but of shrewd financial and political calculation in 15th and 16th-century Rome.^{6, 14} The epicenter of this activity was the papal court, and its focus was the most powerful and consequential public figure in Europe: the Pope.¹⁴

The Sede Vacante as a Financial Market

The period between a pope's death and the election of his successor, known as the sede vacante ("the see being vacant"), plunged Rome into a state of profound uncertainty.^{7, 16} Papal government temporarily ceased, and the city's political and economic life hung in the balance.¹⁶ For the bankers, merchants, and noble families whose fortunes were intertwined with the papacy, predicting the outcome of the next papal conclave was a matter of critical importance.^{7, 17} In this environment, wagering on the duration of a pontificate or the identity of the next pope emerged as a primitive form of futures trading.^{6, 18} Businessmen who had extended loans to the papacy, for instance, would take out what were effectively life insurance policies on the sitting pope.¹⁸ These were not acts of morbid curiosity but a logical hedge against the risk that a new pontiff might not honor the debts of his predecessor.^{9, 19} This practice of using insurance as a speculative tool became so common that it was eventually banned in other major commercial hubs, including Barcelona in 1435 and Genoa in 1467.^{9, 19}

Early Bans and Formalization

The practice of betting on the pope's life was already so established and potentially disruptive by the early 15th century that it prompted legal intervention.²¹ The Republic of Venice, a major financial power, forbade it in 1419 and nullified all existing bets.^{9, 22} By the 16th century, the system had become highly organized.²² The first recorded instance of gambling on specific candidates for the papacy occurred during the conclave of September 1503, though historian Frederic Baumgartner notes it was already considered an "old practice" at the time.^{9, 23} Roman banking houses became the de facto bookmakers, employing messengers known as sensali to scurry between clients and deliver betting slips.^{6, 24} During the papal conclave of 1549–1550, bankers offered complex betting spreads on the various papabili (cardinals considered likely to be elected). The odds fluctuated wildly with new information, such as the arrival of French cardinals, demonstrating a sophisticated, information-driven market.^{9, 25}

A Game for All Classes

While the financial elite placed bets that could involve thousands of gold ducats, wagering on the papacy was a pastime that permeated all levels of Roman society.^{6, 27} Court records from the era show that artisans—tailors, blacksmiths, masons, and shoemakers—were frequent participants, sometimes wagering a substantial portion of their annual income on the outcome of a conclave.^{6, 27} The system was rife with what would now be called insider trading.²⁸ Venetian ambassador Enrico Dandolo observed in 1549 that cardinals' attendants often went into partnership with the city's merchants on wagers, feeding them information from within the supposedly secret conclave.^{6, 29} Even the cardinals themselves were known to place informal bets with one another, wagering amber rosaries, mules, or money on the election's outcome.^{6, 29} This broad participation illustrates how deeply the practice was woven into the social and political fabric of Renaissance Rome, blurring the lines between gossip, political analysis, and financial speculation.²⁹

The Papal Crackdown: Cogit nos

The widespread gambling on papal lives and elections eventually became untenable for the Church.³¹ The practice fueled rampant rumor-mongering, as brokers in the Banchi (Rome's financial district) would sometimes spread false reports to manipulate the betting odds.^{6, 32} More profoundly, it was seen as a sacrilege that mixed the sacred process of electing the Vicar of Christ with the profane customs of the marketplace.^{6, 32} This led Pope Gregory XIV to issue a definitive condemnation.³³ On March 21, 1591, he promulgated the papal bull Cogit nos ("It compels us").^{10, 34} The edict forbade, under the severe penalty of excommunication, all forms of betting related to the papacy: the election of a new pope, the duration of a pontificate, or the creation of new cardinals.^{6, 34} The bull's text explicitly condemned the brokers of the Banchi for the turmoil their wagers provoked.^{6, 34} This was not merely a pious declaration; it was driven by a very real and pragmatic fear that a large enough betting pool could create a financial incentive for someone to assassinate the pope to win their wager—a concept now understood as a moral hazard.^{12, 35} The bull was printed in Italian and posted publicly throughout Rome, and its effect was immediate.³⁵ Organized, public wagering on the papacy effectively disappeared after 1592, driven underground by the threat of spiritual and temporal punishment.^{6, 36} This historical arc reveals a fascinating evolution. What began as a rational, if cynical, financial tool for managing political risk gradually morphed into a form of pure speculation.³⁷ This speculation, in turn, created a perceived threat to the very life it was based on, necessitating its prohibition.³⁸ This progression—from risk management to speculative gamble to moral hazard—establishes a conceptual framework that would reappear centuries later in debates over the ethics of death pools.³⁹

Chapter 2: "A Wager on Lives": Gambling and Mortality in 18th-Century England

As the practice of wagering on papal lives faded in Rome, a new capital of speculative gambling emerged: 18th-century London.⁴¹ During this period, England was seized by what historians have called a "rage for gambling" that permeated every level of society, from the working class in "copper hells" to the aristocracy in exclusive "golden halls".^{13, 42} The subject of these wagers was often life and death itself.⁴²

The Coffeehouse and the Gentlemen's Club

The social hubs for this activity were the city's burgeoning coffeehouses and private gentlemen's clubs.^{16, 44} For the price of a penny, a man could enter a coffeehouse, purchase a coffee, and gain access to news, conversation, and commerce.^{17, 44} These establishments became focal points for specific trades and interests; for example, the insurance industry famously has its roots in Lloyd's Coffee House.^{19, 45} It was in these venues, and in more exclusive clubs like White's on St. James's Street, that wagering on human lives became a fashionable pastime.^{20, 45}

The Betting Books of White's

The meticulously kept betting books of White's club offer a clear window into this world.⁴⁷ The very first entry, dated 1743, records a wager of 150 guineas between two lords on whether the Duchess Dowager of Marlborough would outlive the Duchess Dowager of Cleveland.^{12, 48} The books are filled with similar bets on the longevity, marriages, and births of prominent society figures.^{20, 48} These were not just bets on death but on all of life's unpredictable milestones, placed alongside wagers on political events or which of two raindrops on a windowpane would reach the bottom first.^{20, 48} This was a form of elite entertainment, a way to display wit, wealth, and an almost detached, sporting attitude toward fate.⁴⁸ The wagers could take a darker turn, as illustrated by Horace Walpole's recollection of an infamous (though unrecorded) bet that a man could survive for 12 hours underwater, for which a "desperate fellow" was allegedly hired and sunk in a ship.^{14, 49}

Life Insurance as a Gambling Vehicle

A more systematic form of death-wagering emerged from the nascent life insurance industry.^{24, 51} In the early 18th century, before regulations were established, life insurance was often treated as a speculative instrument rather than a tool for prudential risk management.^{24, 51} It was common practice to purchase an insurance policy on the life of a third party—often a public figure—in whom the policyholder had no direct financial or familial interest.^{25, 51} This was, in essence, a pure gamble on a person's death, with the insurance company acting as the bookmaker.⁵¹ The practice blurred the line between legitimate financial protection and a morbid lottery, appealing directly to the gambling instincts of England's rising middle class.^{26, 52}

The Gambling Act of 1774

The speculative use of life insurance became so widespread and controversial that it eventually prompted parliamentary action.⁵⁴ The Gambling Act of 1774 was a landmark piece of legislation that formally separated the two practices.^{24, 55} The Act banned the purchase of insurance on lives in which the policyholder did not have a real and documented "insurable interest".^{24, 55} This crucial regulation effectively ended the use of life insurance as a vehicle for wagering on the deaths of strangers.⁵⁵ It codified the modern understanding of insurance as a tool to mitigate personal financial risk, not to profit from the abstract possibility of another's demise.⁵⁶ This period in England marks a critical intellectual shift in the history of the dead pool.⁵⁷ The practice moved away from being a bet on a singular, politically charged event, like the death of a pope, and became a more abstract and statistical exercise.⁵⁸ The development of actuarial science and mortality tables, pioneered by figures like Abraham de Moivre who sold risk-calculation advice in London's coffeehouses, began to quantify and systematize life expectancy.^{19, 59} Wagering on who would outlive whom, or on the lives of strangers via unregulated insurance, treated human lifespans as data points in a game of probability.⁵⁹ Death was becoming something that could be calculated, predicted, and wagered upon systematically.⁶⁰ This abstraction laid the conceptual groundwork for the complex, points-based scoring systems of the online dead pools that would emerge two centuries later.⁶¹

Chapter 3: The Americanization of a Macabre Pastime

As the 19th century gave way to the 20th, the locus of the dead pool's evolution shifted again, this time to the United States.⁶³ Here, the game shed its aristocratic and overt financial-speculation roots, re-emerging in forms that reflected a new, distinctly American cultural landscape shaped by high-risk entertainment, a burgeoning celebrity culture, and the cynical humor of the modern newsroom.⁶⁴

High-Risk Sports and Anecdotal Wagers

In the early 20th century, a culture of gambling flourished around high-risk sports.^{27, 66} While horse racing was the most established betting pastime, the advent of motorsports introduced a new and particularly dangerous spectacle.^{29, 66} The first edition of the Indianapolis 500 in 1911, for example, was an event born of "blood and smoke".^{2, 66} The primitive state of automotive technology and track safety meant that fatalities among drivers and spectators were tragically common.^{31, 66} The infamous 1955 Le Mans disaster, which killed driver Pierre Levegh and over 80 spectators, stands as the most catastrophic event in motorsport history.^{32, 66} In such a high-lethality environment, it is anecdotally reported that informal "dead pools" became popular among fans, who would wager on which drivers might not survive a given race.^{2, 67} While formal documentation of these pools is scarce, the palpable risk made death a predictable, and therefore gamble-worthy, outcome.⁶⁷

The Rise of the Office Pool and Journalistic Gallows Humor

The most direct ancestor of the modern celebrity dead pool, however, took shape not in the grandstands but in the offices of 20th-century America.⁶⁹ The "office pool" became a common form of low-stakes social gambling, often centered on sporting events.^{34, 70} It was within the unique culture of the newsroom that this format was first applied to mortality.⁷⁰ Journalists, by nature of their profession, are immersed in the lives and, ultimately, the deaths of public figures.⁷¹ Their work requires a degree of professional detachment and often exposes them to tragedy, fostering a workplace culture where "black humor" or "gallows humor" can serve as an essential coping mechanism.^{35, 72} This morbid wit, combined with an insider's knowledge of the famous, the infamous, and the ailing, created the perfect environment for the celebrity dead pool to crystallize.^{36, 72} Similar informal traditions are said to have existed among the Hollywood press corps in the 1940s and 1950s, where reporters covering the film industry would wager on which of the era's aging or scandal-ridden stars would be the next subject of an obituary.⁷²

The 1934 New York Newspaper Pool

The first well-documented example of this modern format reportedly occurred in 1934 at a New York newspaper.^{12, 75} An employee, whose name is lost to history, devised a macabre lottery.⁷⁵ He wrote the names of 100 prominent individuals—people famous enough to warrant a newspaper obituary—on slips of paper and placed them in a hat.⁷⁶ He then persuaded 100 of his colleagues from various departments to each pay $1 and draw a name.⁷⁷ The participants continued to contribute $1 each week, growing the pot until the first person on the list died, with the winner taking all.^{12, 78} The pool ran for over a year, with the pot reportedly growing to nearly $7,000.^{38, 79} It ended in a dramatic and statistically improbable tie.⁷⁹ On August 15, 1935, two of the celebrities on the list—the famed aviator Wiley Post and the beloved humorist Will Rogers—died together in a plane crash in Alaska.^{12, 80} The two employees holding their names split the winnings.^{12, 80} This event codified the essential elements of the modern game: a curated list of public figures, a group of players, a monetary stake, and a clear win condition tied to media-reported death.⁸⁰ This evolution highlights a critical symbiosis. The modern dead pool is not merely a game about celebrities; it is a game made possible by the media ecosystem that creates and sustains celebrity.^{81, 82} The very criterion for a person's inclusion in the game—being "famous enough to merit an obituary"—is inherently media-driven.^{39, 83} A person's value as a game piece is directly proportional to their media footprint.⁸³ As 24/7 news cycles and celebrity gossip media expanded, they provided players with a constant firehose of data—health updates, rumors of illness, and reports on lifestyle—to inform their predictions.^{2, 84} The game could not exist in its contemporary form without the media apparatus that reports on the lives, and validates the deaths, of its subjects.⁸⁴

Chapter 4: Hollywood Names the Game: The Dead Pool (1988)

For decades, the dead pool remained a niche, informal game, a piece of insider folklore among journalists and other subcultures.⁸⁶ It lacked a common name and mainstream recognition. That changed definitively in 1988 with the release of the fifth and final film in the Dirty Harry franchise: The Dead Pool.^{41, 87}

Plot Synopsis and Cultural Context

In the film, Inspector "Dirty Harry" Callahan (Clint Eastwood) investigates a series of murders targeting local celebrities in San Francisco.^{43, 89} He discovers that the victims, including a drug-addicted rock star played by a young Jim Carrey, are all names on a list for a "dead pool" game being played by a sleazy horror film director, Peter Swan (Liam Neeson), and his associates.^{43, 89} The game involves participants predicting which celebrities on their lists will die.⁸⁹ The plot thickens when the killer begins systematically murdering the people on Swan's list, and Callahan himself discovers his own name is a target.^{42, 90} The film is a fascinating time capsule of late-1980s pop culture, featuring not only future superstars Carrey and Neeson but also a memorable cameo by the then-ascendant rock band Guns N' Roses.^{43, 91} More than just a standard thriller, the movie serves as a self-aware commentary on society's morbid fascination with celebrity and the media's often exploitative role in sensationalizing violence—themes for which the dead pool game provided a perfect narrative centerpiece.^{45, 91}

Mainstreaming the Macabre

The primary cultural impact of The Dead Pool was not in inventing the game, but in branding it.⁹³ Before 1988, the practice existed under various informal names—an "office pool," a "ghoul pool," or perhaps no name at all.⁹⁴ The film provided a singular, catchy, and evocative identity that perfectly captured the game's morbid essence.^{12, 95} By embedding the concept within a popular Hollywood narrative, it gave the game a story, a context, and a set of visual associations that made it instantly recognizable and understandable to a mass audience.⁹⁵ This act of naming and popularizing through a mainstream film was the catalyst that transformed the dead pool from an obscure subcultural pastime into a widespread pop culture trope.⁹⁶ It took the game out of the newsroom and the smoke-filled backroom and placed it squarely in the public consciousness.⁹⁷ The film's release primed the concept for the next great leap in its evolution, which was just on the horizon: the dawn of the public internet.⁹⁸

Chapter 5: The Internet Gives Death a Domain Name

The popularization of the dead pool concept by Hollywood coincided with the rise of a new medium that would democratize the game and allow it to flourish on a global scale.¹⁰⁰ The internet took the informal, localized dead pool and transformed it into a structured, widespread, and highly competitive online hobby.¹⁰¹

Precursors on Usenet

The dead pool's digital life began even before the advent of the World Wide Web, in the text-based forums of Usenet.¹⁰³ In the early 1990s, the newsgroup alt.obituaries served as a community for people with a serious interest in obituaries and the lives of the famous.^{39, 104} It was a natural, if morbid, evolution for this community to move from simply discussing the deaths of public figures to actively predicting them.¹⁰⁴ This led to the formation of the alt.obituaries Deadpool (or AO Deadpool), one of the earliest recorded online versions of the game, which continues to operate today.^{48, 106}

The Pioneers: DeathList.net and Stiffs.com

As the World Wide Web became accessible, dedicated websites emerged to formalize and host dead pool competitions.¹⁰⁸ Two of the most influential pioneers were DeathList.net in the UK and Stiffs.com in the US.¹⁰⁹

• DeathList.net: Originating as a non-digital list shared among friends in 1987, DeathList moved online and became a benchmark for the "curated list" model of the game.^{50, 110} Rather than having players draft their own teams, the site's anonymous committee annually selects and publishes a single list of 50 public figures they believe are likely to die in the coming year.^{51, 110} The winner is, in a sense, the list itself, and the game is about the committee's predictive accuracy.¹¹⁰ Its core rules—that candidates must be famous enough to be reported on by the UK media and cannot be famous solely because they are expected to die—reinforced the game's intrinsic link to the media ecosystem.^{50, 111}
• Stiffs.com: Launching in the mid-1990s, Stiffs.com championed the American "fantasy sports" model.^{53, 112} Its flagship competition, the "Lee Atwater Invitational Dead Pool" (named for the political strategist who was an early pick), had players pay a small entry fee to draft their own roster of celebrities.^{46, 112} The winner, determined by who had the most "hits" at the end of the year, would receive a cash prize or other awards like vacations and electronics.^{53, 112} Stiffs.com also innovated with features like the "SickTicker," a scrolling feed of celebrity health news that mimicked a stock market ticker, further highlighting the game's reliance on media-reported data.^{46, 113}

The "Fantasy League" Format

The model popularized by Stiffs.com and other sites like The Ghoul Pool and Derby Dead Pool became the dominant format for online play.^{12, 115} This structure mimics fantasy sports leagues in nearly every respect.¹¹⁵ Players "draft" a team of celebrities at the beginning of the year.¹¹⁶ When one of their picks dies, they score points.¹¹⁷ Scoring systems are often designed to reward strategic thinking and statistical unlikelihood.¹¹⁷ A common formula is to award points based on age (e.g., 100−age_at_death), making the death of a younger person more valuable than that of a nonagenarian.^{40, 119} Bonus points might be awarded for being the only player to select a particular person or for other specific circumstances.¹¹⁹ This gamification adds layers of strategy that help distance the activity from its morbid subject matter.¹²⁰

Democratization and Community

The internet removed all barriers to entry, transforming the dead pool into a global pastime.¹²² Websites, forums, and eventually social media platforms like Reddit hosted competitions that attracted thousands of players.¹²³ This digital migration allowed for the creation of vast, international communities of players who share a common interest in this unique and dark hobby.¹²⁴

Website	Year Established	Basic Premise	Scoring System Highlights	Key Rules
DeathList.net	1987 (offline)	Committee-selected list of 50 names	"The list ""scores"" by the number of hits (deaths)"	Must be famous enough for UK media coverage; no more than 25 repeats from prior year 50
Stiffs.com	c. 1996	Player-drafted teams; cash prize pool	Primarily based on number of hits	Committee votes on whether a pick is "famous enough" 53
The Ghoul Pool	Online since 1990s	Player-drafted teams; no duplicate picks	Points based on number of hits; published obituary required	Once a celebrity is picked, they are unavailable to others; no death row inmates or children 55
AO Deadpool	Evolved from Usenet group	Player-drafted teams	Points for hits, with bonuses for "solos" (unique picks)	Pick must receive an obituary in a national news outlet 39

This table illustrates the key evolutionary split in the online game.¹²⁶ The British model, exemplified by DeathList, is a curated, almost academic exercise in prediction.¹²⁷ The American model, pioneered by sites like Stiffs.com, is a competitive, gamified format modeled on fantasy sports.¹²⁸ The various rules—requiring media validation, banning duplicate picks, and establishing fame criteria—show how these online communities have grappled with the strategic and ethical challenges inherent in the game, attempting to create a fair and playable system around an inherently grim subject.¹²⁹

Chapter 6: The Legality and Ethics of the Final Bet

As dead pools proliferated online, questions surrounding their legality and morality grew more prominent.¹³¹ The practice occupies a murky space, governed not by specific laws but by broader statutes and a complex set of ethical arguments that pit dark humor against social taboos.¹³²

A Legal Gray Area

In the United States and most other Western jurisdictions, there are no laws that explicitly prohibit "dead pools" by name.^{57, 134} Their legality, therefore, hinges on whether they fall under the definition of illegal gambling.¹³⁴ The distinction is critical. An informal office pool or an online game played purely for "bragging rights" with no monetary exchange is generally considered a harmless social game and is not legally actionable.¹³⁵ However, when a pool involves a mandatory buy-in or entry fee that contributes to a cash prize for the winner, it can technically meet the legal definition of an unlicensed lottery or a form of gambling.^{34, 136} State laws on gambling vary widely, but such pools are rarely, if ever, prosecuted, likely due to their small scale, private nature, and the difficulty of enforcement.^{57, 136} This legal ambiguity is a primary reason why mainstream, regulated betting platforms and sportsbooks almost universally refuse to offer odds on celebrity deaths.¹³⁶ The ethical backlash, reputational damage, and potential legal entanglements make it a toxic market for any legitimate gambling enterprise.^{59, 137}

Celebrity Rights and Misconceptions

A common misconception is that dead pools might violate a celebrity's "right of publicity."¹³⁹ Laws such as California's Celebrities Rights Act are designed to protect the commercial value of a deceased person's name, image, and likeness, preventing their unauthorized use on merchandise or in advertising.^{61, 140} However, these laws are not applicable to dead pools.¹⁴⁰ The game does not use a celebrity's likeness for commercial endorsement or to sell a product; it uses their name as a data point in a predictive game.^{141, 142} The activity, while perhaps tasteless, does not infringe on the intellectual property or posthumous commercial rights of an estate.¹⁴³

The Ethical Debate

The core of the dead pool controversy lies not in law but in ethics.¹⁴⁵ The arguments for and against the practice have remained remarkably consistent.¹⁴⁶

• The Defense: Proponents consistently frame the game as a form of dark humor, arguing it is no different from the gallows humor that has long been a coping mechanism for confronting mortality.^{5, 147} They contend that it is a game of skill, rewarding research, media literacy, and predictive analysis rather than celebrating death.¹⁴⁷ Participants often argue that they have no influence over the outcome—a point reinforced by rules that explicitly disqualify anyone who causes a death—and that the focus is often a satirical commentary on the absurdity of modern celebrity culture.^{40, 148} As one player reasoned, "We're not celebrating the fact that people are dying, but these people are going to die anyway".^{5, 148}
• The Critique: Opponents view the practice as fundamentally morbid, tasteless, and disrespectful to the deceased individuals and their grieving families.^{5, 149} They argue that it commodifies human life, reducing people to mere pieces in a game.¹⁴⁹ The practice is seen as particularly cruel when it targets the elderly or those publicly struggling with illness, turning their suffering into a source of entertainment and potential profit.¹⁵⁰ Psychologists and death education experts have raised concerns that such games can be an unhealthy psychological mechanism for distancing oneself from the emotional reality and gravity of death.^{5, 151}

The modern dead pool's very existence hinges on a paradox.¹⁵² Its core defense, both legally and ethically, is the principle that players have no causal connection to the outcome.¹⁵³ This stands in stark contrast to its historical precursors. The fear surrounding Renaissance-era papal betting was precisely that it could create a causal link through assassination.¹⁵⁴ The 18th-century wagers disguised as life insurance were banned because they created a direct financial interest in a person's death.¹⁵⁵ The modern celebrity dead pool, however, operates at a vast remove.¹⁵⁶ Its subjects are distant public figures, known to players only through the highly mediated lens of screens and headlines.¹⁵⁷ This social and psychological distance is what allows participants to frame the activity as a "harmless" game of skill.¹⁵⁸ The game can only be perceived as harmless because the very celebrity culture it feeds on has already abstracted its subjects from full-fledged human beings into consumable data points, or, in this case, game pieces.¹⁵⁹

Conclusion: An Enduring Reflection on Fame and Finality

The journey of the dead pool spans over six centuries, a remarkable testament to its strange and enduring appeal.¹⁶¹ It began as a high-stakes tool of financial and political speculation in Renaissance Rome, where the death of a pope could reshape fortunes.¹⁶² It evolved into a fashionable, if macabre, form of elite entertainment in the coffeehouses and gentlemen's clubs of Georgian London, a sport for the wealthy and idle.¹⁶³ In 20th-century America, it was reborn as a piece of insider gallows humor in the nation's newsrooms, a cynical game played by those who chronicled the lives of the famous.¹⁶⁴ Finally, with the advent of the internet, it was democratized and gamified, transforming into a global online hobby of morbid sport.¹⁶⁵ The persistence and evolution of this practice holds up a mirror to some of our most enduring human fascinations.¹⁶⁶ It reflects our complex and often contradictory relationship with fame—a force we create and consume, and whose subjects we elevate only to speculate on their downfall.¹⁶⁷ It speaks to our deep-seated need to confront the ultimate uncertainty of mortality, often through the distancing mechanisms of humor, ritual, and games.¹⁶⁸ And it reveals a fundamental impulse to find patterns, to calculate odds, and to impose a sense of predictability on the one event that is certain yet entirely unpredictable.¹⁶⁹ The dead pool, in all its varied forms across the centuries, is more than just a game; it is a cultural artifact that captures our unwavering curiosity about the intersection of public lives and private ends, of fame and finality.^{170, 171}

---

Works Cited

1. en.wiktionary.org, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/dead_pool#:~:text=A%20game%20of%20prediction%20or,%2C%20typically%20celebrities%2C%20will%20die.
2. Dead pool - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dead_pool
3. Dead Pool Definition & Meaning | YourDictionary, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.yourdictionary.com/dead-pool
4. DEADPOOL meaning: Betting pool on deaths occurring - OneLook, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.onelook.com/?loc=rescb&refclue=comics&w=deadpool
5. Death pool game is fun to some, disturbing to others - Xavier ..., accessed August 18, 2025, https://xula.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/api/collection/p16948coll14/id/5397/download
6. Betting on the Papal Election in Sixteenth-Century Rome - Digital ..., accessed August 18, 2025, https://oasis.library.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1038&context=occ_papers
7. Betting on the Pope | UNLV, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.unlv.edu/news/article/betting-pope
8. Betting on the Pope was the original prediction market : r/history - Reddit, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/history/comments/1j444ij/betting_on_the_pope_was_the_original_prediction/
9. Gambling on papal conclaves - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gambling_on_papal_conclaves
10. May We Bet on the Conclave? | Catholic Answers Magazine, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/should-we-gamble-on-the-next-pope
11. Can You Wager or Bet on the Conclave? - Catholic Convert, accessed August 18, 2025, https://catholicconvert.com/can-you-wager-or-bet-on-the-conclve/
12. A Brief History of Dead Pools, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.derbydeadpool.co.uk/a-brief-history-of-dead-pools/
13. Introduction - Gambling in Britain in the Long Eighteenth Century - Cambridge University Press, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/gambling-in-britain-in-the-long-eighteenth-century/introduction/FDFAD09C13CE6A7EEAC59EE2780792E1
14. Blood, Betting and Baiting: The Dark History of London's Pubs - The Victorian Web, accessed August 18, 2025, https://victorianweb.org/history/leisure/pubgambling.html
15. The rampant gaming culture in London's gentlemen's clubs - AUDIUM, accessed August 18, 2025, http://audium.com/img/pages/the_rampant_gaming_culture_in_london_s_gentlemen_s_clubs.html
16. A Penny For Your Cuppa: How Coffeehouses Revolutionized Coffee Consumption in England's Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries M - Publishing at the Library, accessed August 18, 2025, https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/constellations/index.php/constellations/article/download/29457/21407/78042
17. English coffeehouses in the 17th and 18th centuries - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_coffeehouses_in_the_17th_and_18th_centuries
18. eighteenthcenturylit [licensed for non-commercial use only] / Coffeehouse - PBworks, accessed August 18, 2025, http://eighteenthcenturylit.pbworks.com/w/page/121138782/Coffeehouse
19. Fuelled By Coffee - Insurance Museum, accessed August 18, 2025, https://insurance.museum/fuelled-by-coffee
20. Wagers at White's - All Things Georgian, accessed August 18, 2025, https://georgianera.wordpress.com/2018/03/13/wagers-at-whites/
21. The evolution of the coffee shop in the UK - Perfect Daily Grind, accessed August 18, 2025, https://perfectdailygrind.com/2022/01/the-evolution-of-the-coffee-shop-in-the-uk/
22. Amusements of Old London: Clubs and Coffee-houses | Susana's Parlour, accessed August 18, 2025, https://susanaellisauthor.blog/2017/03/13/amusements-of-old-london-clubs-and-coffee-houses/
23. Gambling in London's Most Ruinous Gentlemen's Clubs | London Historians' Blog, accessed August 18, 2025, https://londonhistorians.wordpress.com/2014/06/05/gambling-in-londons-most-ruinous-gentlemens-clubs/
24. Betting on Lives: The Culture of Life Insurance in England, 1695 ..., accessed August 18, 2025, https://archives.history.ac.uk/history-in-focus/welfare/reviews/rosenhaft.html
25. books.google.com, accessed August 18, 2025, https://books.google.com/books/about/Betting_on_Lives.html?id=3wq8AAAAIAAJ#:~:text=While%20serving%20as%20a%20means,of%20wagers%20on%20people's%20deaths.
26. Betting on Lives: The Culture of Life Insurance in England, 1695-1775 - Google Books, accessed August 18, 2025, https://books.google.com/books/about/Betting_on_Lives.html?id=3wq8AAAAIAAJ
27. History of gambling in the United States - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_gambling_in_the_United_States
28. Exploring the History of Gambling in the US - Birches Health, accessed August 18, 2025, https://bircheshealth.com/resources/history-gambling-us
29. Racing in the Depression | American Experience | Official Site - PBS, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/seabiscuit-racing-depression/
30. A comprehensive guide to the history of U.S. gambling culture - Healdsburg Tribune, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.healdsburgtribune.com/us-gambling-culture-history/
31. List of driver deaths in motorsport - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_driver_deaths_in_motorsport
32. 1955 Le Mans disaster - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1955_Le_Mans_disaster
33. Le Mans Auto-Racing Accident Kills More than Eighty | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/sports-and-leisure/le-mans-auto-racing-accident-kills-more-eighty
34. Betting pool - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betting_pool
35. Black comedy - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_comedy
36. Black humour | Dark Comedy, Satire & Irony - Britannica, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/black-humor
37. Factors of Black Humor Popularity - Atlantis Press, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.atlantis-press.com/article/25906537.pdf
38. Death Pools in History | Faithful Readers, accessed August 18, 2025, https://faithfulreaders.com/2012/05/01/death-pools-in-history/
39. Alt.obits Deadpool - Ripe-tomato.org, accessed August 18, 2025, https://ripe-tomato.org/2011/12/03/alt-obits-deadpool/
40. Captain Zany's Death Pool: The Rules - Palisades Amusement Park, accessed August 18, 2025, http://palisadespark.com/dead/rules.htm
41. The Dead Pool (1988) - Movie Review / Film Essay - Gone With The Twins, accessed August 18, 2025, https://gonewiththetwins.com/dead-pool-1988/
42. The Dead Pool - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dead_Pool
43. What Was Jim Carrey's Weirdest Role? - CBR, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.cbr.com/jim-carrey-weirdest-role-the-dead-pool/
44. The Dead Pool (1988) Review | Cinema Parrot Disco - WordPress.com, accessed August 18, 2025, https://table9mutant.wordpress.com/2016/06/01/the-dead-pool-1988-review-2/
45. The Dead Pool | VERN'S REVIEWS on the FILMS of CINEMA, accessed August 18, 2025, https://outlawvern.com/2008/08/09/the-dead-pool/
46. Celebrity Death Pools - Portfolio at NYU, accessed August 18, 2025, https://nyujournalismprojects.org/portfolio/ditto/Celebrity_Death_Pools.html
47. alt.obituaries - Google Groups, accessed August 18, 2025, https://groups.google.com/g/alt.obituaries
48. 2025: Standings - alt.obituaries Deadpool, accessed August 18, 2025, https://aodeadpool.org/standings.html
49. alt.obituaries Deadpool, accessed August 18, 2025, https://aodeadpool.org/
50. The DeathList 2022, accessed August 18, 2025, https://deathlist.net/lists/2022
51. The DeathList 2025, accessed August 18, 2025, https://deathlist.net/
52. The DeathList 2006, accessed August 18, 2025, https://deathlist.net/lists/2006
53. Is 2016 really the year of death? We ask a dead pool boss - CNET, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.cnet.com/culture/2016-year-of-death-dead-pool-stiffs-com-carrie-fisher-george-michael/
54. Web sites of the dead pools - SFGATE, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/web-sites-of-the-dead-pools-3103419.php
55. The Rules of the Big Game - The Ghoul Pool, accessed August 18, 2025, http://www.theghoulpool.com/rules.htm
56. 2025 Celebrity Death Pool - Ship of Fools forums, accessed August 18, 2025, https://forums.shipoffools.com/discussion/6142/2025-celebrity-death-pool
57. Dead Pool/Tontine Legality : r/legaladviceofftopic - Reddit, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/legaladviceofftopic/comments/a9j7xg/dead_pooltontine_legality/
58. Information about some types of gambling - State of Michigan, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.michigan.gov/mdhhs/keep-mi-healthy/mentalhealth/drugcontrol/probgamb/gambcontent/information-about-some-types-of-gambling
59. The Often-Unrecognized Public Health Impact of Gambling, accessed August 18, 2025, https://www.networkforphl.org/news-insights/the-often-unrecognized-public-health-impact-of-gambling/
60. Study Reveals Surge in Gambling Addiction Following Legalization of Sports Betting, accessed August 18, 2025, https://today.ucsd.edu/story/study-reveals-surge-in-gambling-addiction-following-legalization-of-sports-betting
61. California Celebrities Rights Act - Wikipedia, accessed August 18, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Celebrities_Rights_Act
62. Deciding Who Cashes in on the Deceased Celebrity Business - Chapman University Digital Commons, accessed August 18, 2025, https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1142&context=chapman-law-review